jimlloyd40
Autocross Champion
If you agree, then why do you keep voting to deregulate and protect them? Just doesn't make sense.
Who are you speaking to? Deregulate and protect who?
If you agree, then why do you keep voting to deregulate and protect them? Just doesn't make sense.
Who are you speaking to? Deregulate and protect who?
Your bedside manner leaves much to be desired.I was talking to you. You're obviously a conservative. And we're talking about pharmaceutical companies. Is it hard for you follow conversations due to your age or is it a stall tactic?
That's exactly how it works. People die early, expectancy drops. How much? Who knows. There are many coverups, 'The Resident' shows this type of behavior. I realize it's a TV show, but hospitals try to mitigate lawsuits and lower payouts without a doubt.
Your bedside manner leaves much to be desired.
When the dead are elderly, it's not a surprise. I clearly stated when 'people die early' from medical error.So 200,000 dead of covid 19 is such a low percentage, it isn't worth worrying about, BUT 200,000 dead from medical errors is somehow shifting the country's death rate? You are too much. So much for that math prowess of yours.
When the dead are elderly, it's not a surprise. I clearly stated when 'people die early' from medical error.
Reading comprehension FTW.
I was talking to you. You're obviously a conservative. And we're talking about pharmaceutical companies. Is it hard for you follow conversations due to your age or is it a stall tactic?
57 million die in a normal year...looks like we are doing pretty good by comparison.
Coronavirus tests undergo performance checks by FDA...many with 'data not returned,' some are 3,000 times less accurate than others.
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices...s/sars-cov-2-reference-panel-comparative-data
https://www.foxnews.com/health/fda-releases-coronavirus-tests-performance-data
57 million die in a normal year...looks like we are doing pretty good by comparison.